TerriK Investigation PART 1
This is a legalistic explanation of exactly how Fukino et al were not entirely truthful in written statements sent to TerriK, and how they did not (by Hawaii law) direct TerriK to the relevant statutes and sub-statutes to help her in her quest. TerriK did not understand the legal language completely and definitely needed Leo the lawyer to ferret out a valid legal way to confront the Hawaii officials, revealing their intentional “misdirection” of a citizen.
As in most every court case, it is not the truth of the issue that prevails, but the more brilliant lawyer that decides the outcome. I would bet on Leo over AG Mark Bennett. But as we have learned in all things regarding Obama elibigility, it is the judge who holds the power.
ADDENDA:: Please read the back and forth comment of ” Nellie” at 10:01 am with Leo’s responses–best way to get a handle on the issues.